Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 So. 2d 1126 - State v. Wallace

734 So. 2d 1126 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. State · State v. Allen · 336 So. 2d 127 - Hively v. State · 613 So. 2d 441 - Burks v. State · 569 So. 2d 872 - Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the appellee was not found to be in actual possession of the narcotics, the state had the burden of circumstantially establishing his constructive possession of the drugs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he mere presence of the contraband in the closet established that a crime had been committed and that someone was criminally liable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.