Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

734 So. 2d 1139

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-05-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2001

Relies on Cadenhead v. Gaetz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-05-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The revocation of appellant’s community control and probation is AFFIRMED, but the cause is REMANDED with directions to enter a written order conforming to the court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. See Cone v. State, 677 So.2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
/734/so2d/1139 · .json · Public domain