Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 So. 2d 1142 - Smith v. Smith

734 So. 2d 1142 - Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 510 So. 2d 637 - Singer v. Star · 637 So. 2d 968 - SPOLSKI GEN. CONTR. v. Jett-Aire Corp. · 666 So. 2d 199 - UFF DAA, INC. v. Towne Realty, Inc. · Sica v. Sam Caliendo Design, Inc. · Villages at Mango Key Homeowners Ass'n v. Hunter Development, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Parties to a lawsuit are entitled to discovery as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure including the taking of depositions, and it is reversible error to enter summary judgment when discovery is in progress and the deposition of a party is pending.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.