¶1We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief as legally insufficient. The motion did not include all the information required by rule 3.850(c). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s refiling an amended motion that complies with the requirements of the rule. See Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
734 So. 2d 1168
Mendes v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 16, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-06-16
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2017
4 state decisions
Relies on Wright v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →