Harvey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 697 So. 2d 504 - Amendments to Rules of Judicial Administration · 699 So. 2d 1369 - Inquiry Concerning a Judge Re Alley · 728 So. 2d 1165 - Rivera v. State · Dorian v. State · Soca v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant is abusing the judicial process by filing successive motions that attempt to litigate issues that were, could or should have been raised in prior proceedings. Those claims that are not repetitive are totally baseless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.