Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 SO2D 39 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · California v. Hodari D. · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. This Court reasoned that one of the officers testified he did not have any particular reason to suspect the defendant was committing a crime, but that his purpose in approaching the defendant was to conduct a field interview to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Nothing at the hearing on the motion to suppress indicated that the officers coerced the defendant or that he was not free to leave or walk away. We find that this encounter took place with the defendant's consent in a public place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “State v. Tucker, 626 So.2d 707 (La.1993); State v. Gibson, 97-1203 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/25/98) , 708 So.2d 1276 . A person has not been”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.