Stoutamire v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · Williamson v. Williamson · 703 So. 2d 444 - State v. Powell · Hopping v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“double jeopardy considerations preclude a trial court from imposing a sentence following revocation of the probationary portion of a `true split sentence' that exceeds the suspended portion of the original sentence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chappel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.