Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

734 So. 2d 602

Docket No. 98-2680.

Daiuto v. State

Robert DAIUTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-07-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1999

2 state decisions

Relies on 681 So. 2d 1136 - King v. State · Crossley v. State · Simon v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-07-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Robert Daiuto appeals from the habitual offender sentence imposed following his violation of probation in case number 92-1371-CF. We reverse and remand for resentencing. See Norton v. State,719 So.2d 985 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) ("Because Norton was not sentenced as a habitual offender initially, he cannot be sentenced as such after revocation of probation."); see also King v. State,681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996); Simon v. State,684 So.2d 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶5Daiuto also argues that the court erred by denying his motion to sever the grand theft of a firearm charge for trial in case number 97-1470-CF. Finding no abuse of discretion, we reject his argument. Crossley v. State,596 So.2d 447 (Fla.1992).

¶6AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

¶7ANTOON, C.J., COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

/734/so2d/602 · .json · Public domain