734 So. 2d 658 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Sullivan v. Louisiana · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 664 So. 2d 94 - State v. Johnson · State v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he courts of this state have time and again refused to allow prosecutors to exploit a defense counsel's inattention, omission, or mistake by making repeated and persistent prejudicial comments and references about inadmissible evidence of other crimes of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington“to the issue. In reversing, the appellate court noted that the jurisprudence reviewing other crimes evidence being admitted after a defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington“it tends to prove a material issue and has independent relevance other than showing that the defendant is a man of bad character.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.