State v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem · Allen v. Oklahoma · 684 So. 2d 368 - State v. Seals
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“They contained none of the cultural, geographic, or linguistic classifications which, due to the ease with which such classifications may serve as a proxy for an impermissible classification, invite particularly exacting scrutiny. See Burns, 98-0602 at p. 21, 734 So.2d at 705 . Accordingly, the state sustained its burden of articulating”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.