Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 SO2D 961 - State v. Touissant

State v. Touissant’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge's determination pertaining to purposeful discrimination rests largely on credibility evaluations, so his findings are entitled to great deference by the reviewing court. The trial judge, advantaged by observing the characteristics and demeanor of the attorneys and prospective jurors, occupies the best position for deciding whether a discriminatory objective underlies peremptory challenges. (citations omitted)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.