Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 SW2D 565 - State v. Bowling

State v. Bowling’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2007

9 state decisions

50198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Howard · Bottoson v. Florida · McDonald v. Missouri · State v. Lingar · United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The foregoing precedents clearly indicate that motions to change the venue and to disqualify a judge must be accompanied by a reasonable notice of the time when the motions will be presented and heard by the court. The present rules, significantly in the conjunctive, require that a notice of presentment for hearing be served on the opposing party. This was not done in proper form." Id. at 679 . (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.