Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 734 SW2D 794 - Commonwealth v. Reneer

Commonwealth v. Reneer’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Montgomery v. Commonwealth (1991), Mabe v. Commonwealth (1994)

3 federal appellate · 71 state decisions

2501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · Weaver v. Graham · Miller v. Florida · Godfrey v. Georgia · Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We reserve the right to consider any abuses or injustices . . . and we accept its provisions for the time being under the principle of comity."”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “One of the chief deficiencies in our present procedure is that, after reaching a verdict of guilt, the jury is required to sentence in a vacuum without any knowledge of the defendant’s past criminal record or other matters that might be pertinent to consider in the assessment of an appropriate penalty. On balance, the inconvenience of a bifurcated trial is a small price to pay for a better informed sentencing process.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a legislative attempt to invade the rule making prerogative of the Supreme Court by legislatively prescribing rules of practice and procedure [and therefore] it violate[d] the separation of powers doctrine enunciated in Section 28 of the Kentucky Constitution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.