Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 735 F.2d 1001 - Hart v. Pulte Homes of Michigan Corp.

Hart v. Pulte Homes of Michigan Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

735 F.2d 1001 · 1984

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2011 · most notably Revak v. SEC Realty Corp. (1994), Long v. Shultz Cattle Co. (1989)

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77E (§ 5 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933)

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran · Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pooling of risks and investments among these purchasers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Horizontal commonality ties the fortune of each investor in a pool of investors to the success of the overall venture, [citation omitted] In fact, a finding of horizontal commonality requires a sharing or pooling of funds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.