Cartersville Elevator, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
735 F.2d 1059 · 1984
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2344 · 49 U.S.C. § 10903
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc. · Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission · Colorado v. United States · B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, (Two Cases). B. J. McAdams Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, and Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. And Hilt Truck Line, Inc., Intervenor-Respondents
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if [it] finds that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or permit the abandonment or discontinuance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.