Robinson v. Wyrick’s Empirical Analysis
735 F.2d 1091 · 1984
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2009
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Sumner v. Mata · Sumner v. Mata · California v. Southland Royalty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“actually render[ed] petitioner's state trial fundamentally unfair and hence, violative of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lucero v. Kerby“standard of review clearly places a heavy burden on the appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Blair v. Armontrout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.