United States v. Travis’s Empirical Analysis
735 F.2d 1129 · 1984
Citation profile
97 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Fernandez-Angulo (1990), United States v. Read (1985)
97 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Hill v. United States · United States v. Timmreck · Angrist v. United States · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether a plea agreement has been broken, courts look to 'what was”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the defendant, after he has been advised of the nature of the charge and of his rights, waives in open court prosecution by indictment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Generally, an individual may only be prosecuted for a felony on the basis of a valid indictment returned by a grand jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.