United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
735 F.2d 289 · 1984
Citation profile
59 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Daly (1992), United States v. Vizcarra-Martinez (1995)
59 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Opper v. United States · Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Kentucky v. Indiana · Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Rodriguez · Economic Research Analysts, Inc. v. O'Connell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] jury is entitled to know the circumstances and background of a criminal charge. It cannot be expected to make its decision in a void--without knowledge of the time, place, and circumstances of the acts which form the basis of the charge.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“for the purpose of providing the context in which the crime occurred”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.