Tate v. Frey’s Empirical Analysis
735 F.2d 986 · 1984
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc. (1985), Spruytte v. Walters (1985)
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Mason County Medical Ass'n v. Knebel · Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth · Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to determine if the trial court exceeded reasonable discretion in rendering preliminary relief.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is obvious ... that the district court premised the grant of the preliminary injunction upon constitutional grounds and not state law. Acknowledging that the preliminary injunction, by its very nature is merely interlocutory, the district court should be extended the opportunity to develop more fully the facts • and circumstances peculiar to the case sub judice when the motion for permanent injunction against the third party defendants is heard, taking into consideration the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Pennhurst upon any permanent relief the district court may deem appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"A review of Kentucky state law indicates that the responsibility to provide for the confinement of convicted felons rests upon the state. Kentucky Revised Statute § 532.100 provides that convicted persons be committed to the state for incarceration." Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.