United States v. Redd’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(A) the applicant shows that the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 41 F. Supp. 3d 343 - Minaya v. United States

2. “none of the cases the Supreme Court remanded for further proceedings in light of Alleyne involved collateral attacks on convictions.” United States v. Winkelman, 746 F.3d 134 , 136 (3d Cir.2014); see also United States v. Redd, 735 F.3d 88 , 91 (2d Cir.2013) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. In re Mazzio

3. “Alleyne did not announce a new rule of law made retroactive on collateral review.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. People v. Barnes