Spears v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
37 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. State · Hammons v. State · Widener v. State · Carter v. State · In re Ballantine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the defendant does not advance a factor to be mitigating at sentencing, this Court will presume that the factor is not significant and the defendant is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Francis v. State · Moyer v. State“[T]he issue is not whether in our judgment the sentence is unreasonable, but whether it is clearly, plainly, and obviously so.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State · Culvahouse v. State“a trial court may not use a factor constituting a material element of an offense as an aggravating circumstance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Moyer v. State · Bunch v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.