Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 735 N.E.2d 1161 - Spears v. State

Spears v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

37 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. State · Hammons v. State · Widener v. State · Carter v. State · In re Ballantine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant does not advance a factor to be mitigating at sentencing, this Court will presume that the factor is not significant and the defendant is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he issue is not whether in our judgment the sentence is unreasonable, but whether it is clearly, plainly, and obviously so.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a trial court may not use a factor constituting a material element of an offense as an aggravating circumstance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.