State v. Calamity’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2015
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Butler · Fare v. Michael C. · United States v. Rice · State v. Kimbel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[When the definition of the offense does not specify a culpable mental state and the offense does not involve strict liability, intent, knowledge, or recklessness shall suf-fiee to establish criminal responsibility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jeffs · State v. Barela“intentional, knowing or reckless mental state.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jeffs · State v. Barela“A witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that he has personal knowledge of the matter. Evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not, consist of the testimony of the witness himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eldredge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.