Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 735 P2D 879 - People v. Freeman

People v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2020

15 state decisions

8019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dann v. Johnston · Schubert v. People · Goedecke v. State, Dept. of Institutions · People v. Quinonez · People v. Chavez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I would conclude that causation is amply established. The defendant was held in jail in Denver because of two charges, one filed in Denver and the other in Jefferson County. Dismissal of either would not have gained freedom for the defendant. Satisfying bail requirements for either alone would also not have resulted in the defendant’s release. Under these circumstances, I am persuaded that there is a substantial nexus between the Jefferson County charge and the period of the defendant’s confinement subsequent to the issuance of the Jefferson County warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.