735 So. 2d 213 - Arthur v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The final Barker factor is the resulting prejudice to Arthur. This is where Arthur loses his argument.’’) (emphasis added). . United States v. MacDonald, 456 U.S. 1, 8 , 102 S.Ct. 1497, 1502 , 71 L.Ed.2d 696 (1982) (emphasis added). . Plur. Op. at ¶ 11. . Price, 898 So.2d at 648 (citing Beavers, 498 So.2d at 790 ). . Plur. Op. at ¶ 11. . Ferguson, 576 So.2d at 1255 (emphasis added). . Prince v. Alabama, 507 F.2d 693 (5th Cir.1975). . Moore v. Arizona, 414 U.S. 25 , 94 S.Ct. 188 , 38 L.Ed.2d 183 (1973). . Hoskins v. Wainwright, 440 F.2d 69, 72 (5th Cir.1971) (hereinafter”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 68 So. 3d 1239 - Johnson v. State

2. “The United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo , employed a four pronged balancing test in determining whether a defendant had been deprived of his right to a fair trial. The four prongs are: (1) length of delay, (2) the reason for the delay, (3) the defendant's assertion of his right, and (4) prejudice to the defendant.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 829 So. 2d 1253 - Malone v. State

3. “Every person who shall feloniously take or attempt to take from the person or from the presence the personal property of another and against his will by violence to his person or by putting such person in fear of immediate injury to his person by the exhibition of a deadly weapon shall be guilty of robbery....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 813 So. 2d 694 - McDowell v. State