735 So. 2d 290 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ross v. State · Goss v. State · Artis v. State · 585 So. 2d 738 - Moore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [I]n its order allowing suspension of a sentence, the court will generally prescribe terms and conditions which the prisoner must follow in order for the suspension period to continue. These conditions serve as the terms of “probation.” ... If a prisoner is under court imposed probation, he or she may be placed in prison if the conditions of probation are not followed.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“If you mess up in eight years from the time you get out of Parchman, if you mess up, commit another crime, don't pay this money within ninety days after you are released from Parchman, then you could end up having eight years to actually go back and serve, understand that, what is called a revocation or a taking away of your eight years suspended sentence and having to actually serve out the remainder of the sentence, do you understand that?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tunstall v. State“pending your future good behavior ... Do you understand that?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tunstall v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.