Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 735 SO2D 513 - Adlington v. State

Adlington v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · State v. Callaway · Davis v. State · 728 So. 2d 192 - Davis v. State · 730 So. 2d 265 - Dixon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 is unavailable for matters not ascertainable from the face of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Rule 3.800(a) is limited to the correction of illegal sentences which do not require an evidentiary hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.