735 So. 2d 579 - Purcell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Alford v. State · McFadden v. State · 661 So. 2d 288 - Gibson v. State · 385 So. 2d 132 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that might at first blush appear to be lacking any basis at all thus far in the trial, so long as counsel states a basis tending ultimately to show such bias.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Questions touching interest, motives, animus, or the status of witnesses to the suit, or parties to it are not collateral or immaterial. As to such matters inquiry may be had, and it is not within the discretion of the court to exclude it ...." [e.s.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any party... may attack the credibility of a witness by . . . (2) Showing that the witness is biased.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.