Cosden Oil & Chemical Co. v. Karl O. Helm Aktiengesellschaft’s Empirical Analysis
736 F.2d 1064 · 1984
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2015
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship · Balistrieri v. United States · Williams v. United States · Lego v. Twomey · Triton Oil & Gas Corp. v. Marine Contractors and Supply, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the seller must notify the buyer seasonably that there will be a delay or non-delivery and, when allocation is required under paragraph (b) of this Code section, of the estimated quota thus made available for the buyer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.