Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F.2d 1299 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

736 F.2d 1299 · 1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2018

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Oregon v. Kennedy · Wade v. Hunter · United States v. Dinitz · United States v. Josef Perez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conduct giving rise to the successful motion for mistrial was intended to provoke the defendant into moving for a mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “valued right to have his trial completed by a particular tribunal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.