Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F.2d 283 - Russell v. Harrison

Russell v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

736 F.2d 283 · 1984

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
3
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Galindo v. Precision American Corp. (1985), Schaper v. City of Huntsville (1987)

40 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

4401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bishop v. Wood · Carey v. Piphus · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no genuine issue as to any material fact,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the right to respond in writing ... and to respond orally before the official charged with the responsibility of making the termination decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) written notice of the reasons for termination and (2) an effective opportunity to rebut those reasons,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.