Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F.2d 320 - Adams v. Oj Keller US

Adams v. Oj Keller US’s Empirical Analysis

736 F.2d 320 · 1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
November 1988
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4201 · 18 U.S.C. § 5010 · 18 U.S.C. § 844

Relies on Butz v. Economou · Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations · Procunier v. Navarette · Watt v. Alaska · Dorszynski v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress altered the focus of parole decisions for youthful offenders by mandating that the Parole Commission no longer follow the traditional parole procedures of the YCA,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.