Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F.2d 365 - Houston v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Houston v. Secretary of Health & Human Services’s Empirical Analysis

736 F.2d 365 · 1984

Citation profile

235
cited by 235 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

148 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 235 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Duncan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1986), John VARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee (1987)

148 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

9801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Beavers v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Allen v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 235 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]olerance of pain is a highly individual matter and a determination of disability based on pain by necessity depends largely on the credibility of the claimant.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.