Branch v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
736 F.2d 533 · 1984
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2015
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on McMann v. Richardson · Whalen v. United States · United States v. Park · Kolender v. Lawson · Whitten v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reach the question of so applying the due process clause in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allbee v. Maass“'authorized' by state law within the meaning of Whalen,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allbee v. Maass
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.