Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F.2d 66 - United States v. Zarintash

United States v. Zarintash’s Empirical Analysis

736 F.2d 66 · 1984

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably United States v. Bertoli (1994), McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Co. (1985)

34 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 7 · 21 U.S.C. § 955A · 21 U.S.C. § 960 · 21 U.S.C. § 963

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Schneble v. Florida · United States v. District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reading only a portion of the testimony may cause the jury to give that portion undue emphasis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the responsibility of the trial court to determine the exact contours of the jury’s interest in the testimony.” Id. Nonetheless, the District Court failed to explain its decision to deny the jury’s request. The relevant part of the record reveals only this statement from the District Court:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[u]nless there is a reasonable possibility that [the error] contributed to the conviction, reversal is not required.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.