Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F.3d 226 - Cabala v. Crowley

Cabala v. Crowley’s Empirical Analysis

736 F.3d 226 · 2013

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Relies on Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Marek v. Chesny · McNeill v. United States · 133 S. Ct. 1523 - Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk · Fox v. Vice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the parties continued to dispute the form and extent of the relief to which [plaintiff] was entitled, the case never became moot.”). . Chafin, 133 S.Ct. at 1023 . . Chafin, 133 S.Ct. at 1026 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.