United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
736 F.3d 54 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 115 · 18 U.S.C. § 2261A · 18 U.S.C. § 876 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 14132 (§ 210304 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 42 U.S.C. § 14135A
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Leon · United States v. Calandra · Nardone v. United States · United States v. Dionisio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it, and sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.