Ortega v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
736 F.3d 637 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Puerto Rico District Court)
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kucana v. Holder · Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder · Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe · Hasan v. Holder · Castañeda-Castillo v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would be purely advisory and beyond our authority under Article III.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Daoud v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.