Campbell v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
736 F.3d 867 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 5 U.S.C. § 504 (Equal Access to Justice Act)
Relies on Scarborough v. Principi · Smolen v. Chater · Thangaraja v. Gonzales · Meier v. Colvin · Al-Harbi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While ⅝ this circuit has been clear that when an agency’s decision is unsupported by substantial evidence it is a strong indication that the position of the United States is not substantially justified, this circuit has never stated that every time this court reverses and remands the ALJ’s decision for lack of substantial evidence the claimant should be awarded attorney’s fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Decker v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.