Long v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
736 F.3d 891 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 34 Cal. 4th 1149 - People v. Young · Lambert v. Blodgett · Rausch v. United States · 30 Cal. 4th 43 - People v. Snow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we must respect the exclusive province of the jury to determine the credibility of witnesses, resolve evidentiary conflicts, and draw reasonable inferences from proven facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“view[ing] the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lucero v. Holland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.