Ibarra v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
736 F.3d 903 · 2013
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 3509 · 25 U.S.C. § 3202 · 42 U.S.C. § 13031 · 42 U.S.C. § 3796A · 42 U.S.C. § 5106G · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Taylor v. United States · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Morissette v. United States · Bailey v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[c]rime” means crime; not civil adjudication. This distinction is important because “child abuse” and “child neglect” are frequently defined in other areas of law: evidence law regarding child witnesses; mandatory-reporting law; and family welfare law. The terms are usually. defined differently in civil law as compared to criminal law...The purpose of civil definitions [of child abuse] is to determine when social services may intervene. The purpose of criminal definitions is to determine when, an abuser is criminally culpable.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ny alien who at any time after admission is convicted of ... a crime of child abuse ... is deportable.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“) with two prior DUI convictions. At the time of his final DUI, he had a child in his car who was not wearing a seatbelt. For this reason, he was also convicted of felony child endangerment under California Penal Code § 273a(a). The Department of Homeland Security initiated removal proceedings on the grounds that Martinez-Cedillo's conviction under California Penal Code § 273a(a) was a crime of child abuse, neglect, or abandonment under § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i). An Immigration Judge (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.