J.R. v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probative value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 341 F. Supp. 3d 1326 - Martin v. Kemp

2. “[A] § 1983 claim alleging a denial of procedural due process requires proof of three elements: (1) a deprivation of a constitutionally-protected liberty or property interest; (2) state action; and (3) constitutionally-adequate process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Blaine v. N. Brevard Cnty. Hosp. Dist.

3. “procedural due process rules are shaped by the risk of error inherent in the truthfinding process as applied to the generality of cases, not the rare exceptions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 341 F. Supp. 3d 1326 - Martin v. Kemp