736 F. Supp. 1024 - Wright v. Minter’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Kennedy v. Dixon · Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co. · Berghammer v. Smith · Carver v. Schafer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[cjlaims for loss of consortium are governed by the law of the state where the marriage is domiciled, rather than by the law of the state where the [physical] injury occurred. . . . The state in which the marriage is domiciled has a greater interest... in a loss of consortium case, than does the state where the incident occurred.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In an action for personal injury, the local law of the state where the injury occurred determines the rights and liabilities of the parties unless with respect to the particular issue some other state has a more significant relationship under the principles stated in § 6 to the occurrence and the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.