Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 F. Supp. 261 - Korman v. Iglesias

736 F. Supp. 261 - Korman v. Iglesias’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2011

3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 506 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Jenkins v. McKeithen · Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises · Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Copyright Act neglected to provide for remedies between co-authors.... The District of Columbia, Second, and Ninth Circuits have held and Congress must have intended that co-authors may claim for an accounting ... under common law principles since the Copyright Act makes no mention of how co-authors should enforce their rights to royalties as against each other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Joint authors co-owning copyright in a work are deemed to be tenants in common, with each having an independent right to use or license the copyright, subject only to a duty to account to the other co-owner for any profits owned thereby.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a civil action or proceeding under this chapter may be commenced at any time within 5 years after the conduct in violation of a provision of this act terminates or the cause of action accrues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.