Whitehouse v. Ives’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396C (§ 1904 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396R (§ 1924 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Weinberger v. Salfi · Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Milhollin · Schweiker v. Gray Panthers · Califano v. Jobst · United States v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to an applicant. Id. Problems arose under this system, however, and the non-institutionalized spouse (called the community spouse) sometimes was left without sufficient assets or income to maintain himself or herself. The federal statute at issue is meant to address the issue of spousal impoverishment. The major portion of the statute was enacted as part of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988, P.L. 100-360 (1988 Act). The 1988 Act made substantial changes in the treatment of the community spouse's resources for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.