Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 P.2d 1059 - State v. Ramon

State v. Ramon’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2011

4 state decisions

101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lamm · Whitwell v. State · State v. Peterson · State v. Murphy · State v. Doster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court may allow an information to be amended if two conditions are met: (1) no additional or different offense is charged, and (2) the substantial rights of the defendant[] are not prejudiced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “receives, retains, or disposes of the property of another knowing that it has been stolen, or believing that it probably has been stolen, ... intending to deprive the owner of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.