Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 P2D 1145 - Nelson v. Nelson

Nelson v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2025

10 state decisions

4019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merrill v. Merrill · In Re Marriage of Graham · 37 Cal. 3d 762 - In Re Marriage of Sullivan · 101 Wash. 2d 168 - In Re the Marriage of Washburn · In Re the Marriage of Horstmann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his does not mean that the spouse who has worked and made other sacrifices while the other spouae has attained a potentially lucrative professional degree is without a remedy. The earning ability of the parties and their conduct during the marriage are relevant to a property division. Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546, 548 (Alaska 1962). The fact that the work of one spouse has contributed to the earning potential of the other may justify a favorable award of property to the supporting spouse: When a person supports a spouse through professional school in the mutual expectation of future financial benefit to the community, but the marriage ends before that benefit can be realized, that circumstance is a “relevant factor” which must be considered in making a fair and equitable division of property....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An advanced degree is a cumulative product of many years of previous education, combined with diligence and hard work. It may not be acquired by the mere expenditure of money. It is simply an intellectual achievement that may potentially assist in the future acquisition of property. In our view, it has none of the attributes of property in the usual sense of that term.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.