Crow-Watson 8 v. Miranda’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Department of Highways v. Biella · Biella v. State Department of Highways · Orebaugh v. Doskocil · Realty World-Range Realty, Ltd. v. Prochaska · Kwik Way Stores, Inc. v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“C.R.C.P. 55(b) provides in relevant part: If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action, the party ... shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least three days prior to the hearing on such application. If, in order to enable the court to enter judgment or to carry it into effect, it is necessary to take an account or to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment by evidence or to make an investigation of any other matter, the court may conduct such hearings or order such references as it deems necessary and proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.