Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

736 P.2d 530

Kimberlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1987-04-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1988

2 state decisions

Relies on Sisson v. City of Oklahoma City

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

¶2The appellant, Walter Lee Kimberlin, was convicted of the crimes of Speeding and Driving Under Suspension in the District Court of Tulsa County in Case Nos. TR-84-13240 and TR-84-13241 and was fined four hundred dollars ($400), and he appeals.

¶3This Court is unaware of what transpired at appellant’s trial due to the fact that appellant failed to make trial transcripts a part of the record in this case as required by 22 O.S.1981, ch. 18, App., Rule 3.2. Apparently, however, appellant was convicted of exceeding the fifty-five (55) mile per hour speed limit, and operating a motor vehicle while his license was suspended.

¶4Appellant raises seven assignments of error on appeal; however, we observe that he does not deny the charges brought against him and offers no legitimate defense. He simply raises patently frivolous constitutional issues which are not supported by relevant argument or authority; therefore, we will not consider these alleged contentions. Sisson v. State, 714 P.2d 1043 (Okl.Cr.1986).

¶5Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
/736/p2d/530 · .json · Public domain