Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 P2D 775 - Knutson v. State

Knutson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2003

7 state decisions

30198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes · Lee v. Illinois · Davis v. United States · Massler v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Legal accountability based upon the conduct of another: Complicity. A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another constituting an offense if (1) the person is made legally accountable by a provision of law defining the offense; (2) with intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the offense, the person (A) solicits the other to commit the offense; or (B) aids or abets the other in planning or committing the offense; or (3) acting with the culpable mental state that is sufficient for the commission of the offense, the person causes an innocent person or a person who lacks criminal responsibility to engage in the proscribed conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Vaden v. State · Kinegak v. State
  2. “Legal accountability based upon conduct. A person is guilty of an offense if it is committed by the person’s own conduct or by the conduct of another person for which the person is legally accountable under § 100 of this chapter, or by both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Kinegak v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.