Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 P2D 783 - Crouse v. State

Crouse v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Chaney · Austin v. State · State v. Wortham · Leuch v. State · State v. Graybill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Certainly, [when a court revoked probation,] the court can consider intervening conduct, and the circumstances of the original offense, as well as the defendant’s background and experience as they existed at the time of the original sentencing. However, the total sentence must nevertheless be justifiable when compared to sentences received by sim ilar defendants committing similar crimes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.